• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

+1 866 593 0032

info@microseismic.com

10777 Westheimer Rd, Suite 250, Houston, TX 77042

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • X

Microseismic Inc Logo

Microseismic

Completions Evaluation – Data Acquisition and Analysis

  • Home
  • Solutions
    • Frac Driven Interactions – FracRX®
    • Carbon Capture and Sequestration – CO2SeQure®
    • Geothermal Energy – MicroThermal Energy
    • Sinkhole Detection – KarstAlert®
    • Pipeline Monitoring for Water and CO2
  • Our Science
    • Customer Stories
    • Technology Advancements
    • Technical Papers
    • Videos
    • Articles
    • Podcasts
    • Blog
  • Sustainability
    • Environment
    • Safety
    • Social
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Leadership
    • Press Releases
    • Investors
    • Careers
  • Contact
    • Ask Peter
  • Events
    • Energizing Tomorrow Virtual Talks

Webinar | 2013 | November | Comparison of Fracture Planes in the Marcellus and Utica Shales

Written by: wfLevyllc

Presenter: Mary Ellison, Geologist, MicroSeismic, Inc.

Date: November 19, 2013 at 10 AM CST

Title: Comparison of Fracture Planes in the Marcellus and Utica Shales

Summary: Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have opened up shale plays to new or continued production. Operators seeking to produce oil, gas, or condensate need to understand the natural and induced fracture patterns within the shales. Surface and near-surface microseismic monitoring allows for the identification of focal mechanisms which indicate the mode of rock failure within the shale. Additionally, as new shales in familiar basins, such as the Appalachian, become more profitable, patterns and similarities within the basin are crucial to understanding treatment and completion techniques. In this presentation, we show the surface array data collected in both the Marcellus and Utica Shales in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.  In addition, we show a compilation of source mechanism orientations from each project as they are compared by county and by target formation. Results show that there are two orientations in the Marcellus that match with known fracture sets. The orientations in the Utica shale match one of the fracture sets in the Marcellus, but there is a third orientation that is not seen in the Marcellus shale.

Category: Webcasts

Let’s Work Together

Send us some information about your project.

Get In Touch

Use the form below to tell us about your project

Name(Required)

Well Information

Operations

Real-time required?

What are your objectives?

Monitoring (Check all that apply)
Optimize Completion Design (Check all that apply)
Testing (check all that apply)

Join Us for our Next Virtual Talk!

1 event found.
Today

June 2025

Thu 26
June 26 @ 9:00 am – 10:00 am CDT

Blue Flint Case Study

Exploring the Future of CCS: Challenges, Opportunities, and Real-World Solutions This presentation takes a deep dive into the critical challenges and emerging opportunities in launching Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects.

  • Previous Events
  • Today
  • Next Events
  • Google Calendar
  • iCalendar
  • Outlook 365
  • Outlook Live
  • Export .ics file
  • Export Outlook .ics file

Quick Links

Home

Our Story

Solutions

News

Company

Technical Papers

Articles

Customer Stories

Careers

Contact Us

+1 866 593 0032

info@microseismic.com

10777 Westheimer Rd,
Suite 250,
Houston, TX 77042

Follow Us

PROUD MEMBER

Copyright © 2025

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy